Most futures research is the work of social, managerial and natural scientists and specialists in technology assessment.

Historians are conspicuous by their absence.

When they do contribute, they usually limit themselves to studies of the history of futurism itself. It is argued that all inquiry into the future is a species of applied history, in which historians should play a far greater part.

Support for the argument is drawn from a new book which attacks the ‘dread of change’ and the ‘closure of the historical mind’ in postmodern thought, Mythical Past, Elusive Future: History and Society in an Anxious Age, by Frank Füredi.

Do you like Alex's articles? Follow on social!
READ  Gene Spafford's axioms of Usenet
No Comments
Comments to:Dread of change

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Attach images - Only PNG, JPG, JPEG and GIF are supported.


    Welcome to Typer

    Brief and amiable onboarding is the first thing a new user sees in the theme.
    Join Typer
    Registration is closed.